Understanding the Two Stages of Small Claims Tribunal Proceedings in the DIFC

Introduction to the Stages of the DIFC Small Claims Tribunal Proceedings

The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Small Claims Tribunal (SCT) provides an efficient and cost-effective forum for resolving disputes within the DIFC jurisdiction. Designed to facilitate swift resolutions, the SCT process is divided into two main stages: the Consultation stage and the Hearing stage. While the tribunal promotes self-representation, parties may request permission to be represented by legal counsel in specific circumstances.

Stage One: Consultation

The first stage of an SCT proceeding is the Consultation, which aims to encourage settlement between the parties without the need for a formal hearing. This stage is presided over by a judge or court officer who facilitates confidential discussions between the parties. The primary objective is to achieve an amicable resolution through mediation and negotiation.

Key aspects of the Consultation stage include:

• The process is conducted in a confidential and informal manner.
• A judge or court officer assists the parties in exploring mutually acceptable solutions.
• Any settlement reached is recorded as a binding court order, enforceable in the same manner as a judgment.
• If settlement is not achieved, the matter proceeds to the Hearing stage.
• The emphasis is on open dialogue rather than adversarial argument.

Stage Two: Hearing

If the dispute remains unresolved after the Consultation stage, the case moves to the Hearing stage. This phase follows a more structured format, during which the presiding judge reviews evidence and hears submissions before issuing a final decision.

Key aspects of the Hearing stage include:

• Proceedings remain relatively informal, although legal arguments may be presented.
• Parties submit evidence, witness statements, and written or oral submissions.
• The judge issues a final judgment, which is legally binding and enforceable within the DIFC and, in certain circumstances, beyond its jurisdiction.
• The tribunal prioritises substance over procedural formality to promote fairness and efficiency.

Legal Representation in DIFC Small Claims Tribunal Proceedings

A defining feature of the SCT is its emphasis on self-representation. However, legal representation may be permitted with the court’s approval in appropriate cases. Applications for representation are assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account factors such as:

• The complexity of the legal and factual issues involved.
• The relative legal knowledge and experience of the parties.
• Any imbalance that could affect procedural fairness.
• The financial value or significance of the dispute.

Where permission is granted, legal counsel may act on behalf of a party while preserving the SCT’s objective of efficient and proportionate dispute resolution.

Conclusion: The Stages of the DIFC Small Claims Tribunal

The DIFC Small Claims Tribunal offers an accessible and streamlined dispute resolution framework structured around two key stages: Consultation and Hearing. While parties are generally expected to represent themselves, the tribunal allows legal representation where justified and approved by the court.

For businesses and individuals operating within the DIFC, understanding these procedural stages is essential when navigating disputes. Where appropriate, seeking legal guidance can help ensure compliance with procedural requirements and improve prospects of a favourable outcome, while still benefiting from the SCT’s efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

***

We hope this article provides clarity for those considering or already involved in an SCT matter. If you have questions regarding this topic or related issues, please feel free to contact us.

For further insight, explore our publications in English, watch informative videos by Maria Rubert, or view a related video here. You may also consult Maria Rubert’s DIFC Courts playlist here.

Disclaimer: This content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.