New York Convention in UAE

THE NEW YORK CONVENTION IN ACTION: HOW UAE COURTS HANDLE ARBITRATION AWARDS

Introduction to the New York Convention

The story of the New York Convention in the UAE is a story of development and progress.

The New York Convention, formally titled the “Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards,” was adopted by the United Nations in 1958 and is one of the most widely recognized treaties in the field of international arbitration. The primary aim is to ensure that foreign arbitral awards are recognized and enforced with minimal judicial intervention.

With over 160 member countries, the Convention obliges contracting states to recognize and enforce arbitral awards made in other member states, provided they meet certain basic requirements. This international framework provides businesses with the security that, once an arbitral award is issued, it will be enforceable across borders in a straightforward process. It also outlines limited grounds for refusal, typically based on procedural fairness, arbitrability, or public policy.

The UAE’s Accession to the New York Convention

The UAE joined the New York Convention on November 19, 2006. This move marked a significant shift in the UAE’s approach to arbitration, enhancing the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards and aligning the UAE with international arbitration standards. The accession underscored the UAE’s commitment to becoming an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction, attractive to both regional and international businesses.

After joining the Convention, the UAE incorporated its principles into the national legal system, primarily through Article 238 of the UAE Civil Procedures Law (CPL) as amended. This integration was a critical step, as it legally bound UAE courts to uphold the principles of the Convention, particularly regarding the recognition and enforcement of awards unless certain specific grounds for refusal apply.

In 2018, the UAE passed Federal Law No. 6, also known as the UAE Arbitration Law, which is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law and bolstered the UAE’s commitment to arbitration. The Arbitration Law further streamlined enforcement processes for both domestic and foreign awards and established clearer grounds for challenge, making the UAE a more reliable jurisdiction for arbitration.

Application of the New York Convention in UAE Courts

Case Examples and Judicial Approach:

Case 1: Enforcement of an ICC Award by Dubai Court of Cassation

In a notable 2013 case, the Dubai Court of Cassation enforced an ICC arbitral award rendered outside the UAE despite the losing party’s argument that the award contradicted UAE public policy. The court ultimately held that the grounds for refusing enforcement under the New York Convention are narrow and that public policy could only be invoked in cases of severe contradictions with UAE public morals or law. This demonstrated a shift towards a pro-enforcement bias, aligning with the Convention’s minimal intervention policy.

Case 2: Scope of Public Policy and Refusal of Enforcement

In another significant case, the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation denied enforcement of a foreign arbitral award on public policy grounds because the underlying contract related to a non-compliant real estate transaction in Abu Dhabi. This case highlighted that while UAE courts are generally supportive of the New York Convention, they retain discretion when it comes to matters that strongly impact local public policy.

Case 3: Procedural Due Process in Arbitrations

In a 2020 case, a party challenged enforcement on the grounds of alleged procedural irregularities, claiming they had not been properly notified of the arbitration proceedings. The Dubai Court ruled in favor of enforcement, finding that the requirements of due process had been met according to the New York Convention’s standards, and upheld the award. This case reinforces that UAE courts are generally unwilling to overturn awards except in cases of clear procedural injustice.

Recent Case: Tribunal’s Authority Limits

In recent UAE arbitration practice, a noteworthy case exemplifying procedural complexities in award enforcement is the 2022 ruling by the Dubai Court of Cassation in Case No. 1514 of 2022. This case involved an arbitration award issued by a Dubai-based tribunal that had difficulty being enforced in local courts due to procedural challenges surrounding arbitration agreements and authority limits of arbitrators. This case underscores the court’s firm stance on procedural adherence, especially regarding arbitration agreement interpretation and tribunal jurisdiction limits. For instance, issues arose around whether the arbitration agreement’s terms had been fully respected in the award’s issuance. Ultimately, the ruling reinforced the court’s strict view that any perceived overreach by arbitrators could invalidate enforcement attempts, stressing the importance of a clear and narrowly defined scope in arbitration agreements for smoother enforcement​.

General Observations and Trends

Over the years, UAE courts have developed a robust approach to handling New York Convention cases, showcasing a trend of compliance with international standards while carefully weighing public policy exceptions. The cases illustrate that while public policy remains a potential ground for refusal, it is applied narrowly and cautiously, reflecting a significant shift towards greater acceptance of international arbitration norms.

The UAE’s application of the Convention has built confidence among foreign investors and multinational corporations who require reliable dispute resolution mechanisms. As a result, Dubai has become a regional hub for arbitration, with the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) promoting institutional arbitration with international appeal.

Conclusion

The UAE’s commitment to the New York Convention and its evolving arbitration framework demonstrates the country’s role as an arbitration-friendly jurisdiction in the Middle East. Through judicial consistency in enforcing foreign arbitral awards and only rarely invoking the public policy exception, the UAE has reinforced its position as an attractive destination for businesses seeking reliable dispute resolution mechanisms.

By aligning its legal framework with international standards, the UAE strengthens its position as a global trading hub. The application of the New York Convention also highlights the UAE’s willingness to adapt and progress in support of international commerce and investment, reinforcing the confidence of foreign investors.

***

We hope this post will help you understand the application of the New York Convention in UAE Courts and remain available for any questions regarding this post of general application.

For more information published in English you can visit all our publications at this link as well as the videos in English of our Managing Partner Maria Rubert.

*The information on this page is not intended to be legal advice.